FDA Letter API

Park Infusioncare LP dba Preferred Homecare

Letter data

Company
Park Infusioncare LP dba Preferred Homecare
Recipient
Mr. Robert Fahlman | Park Infusioncare LP dba Preferred Homecare | 4601 East Hilton Ave., Suite 100 | Phoenix | , | AZ | 85034 | United States
Issue date
2018-03-01
Posted date
Not available
FDA office
Dallas District Office
Subject
Not available
Product
Not available
CMS ID
547494
Reference number
Not available
FEI
Not available
Inspection dates
2017-06-27 to 2017-07-11

Normalized citations

21 CFR: None found

21 U.S.C.: 21-USC-353

Related FDA links

No related FDA letter link is present in the source index.

Full source text

WARNING LETTER Park Infusioncare LP dba Preferred Homecare MARCS-CMS 547494 — March 01, 2018 More Warning Letters Warning Letters About Warning and Close-Out Letters Recipient: Recipient Name Mr. Robert Fahlman Park Infusioncare LP dba Preferred Homecare 4601 East Hilton Ave., Suite 100 Phoenix , AZ 85034 United States Issuing Office: Dallas District Office United States Office of Pharmaceutical Quality Operations, Division 2 4040 North Central Expressway, Suite 300 Dallas, TX 75204-3158 WARNING LETTER CMS #547494 March 1, 2018 UPS OVERNIGHT MAIL Mr. Robert Fahlman, Chief Executive Officer Preferred Homecare (Corporate Office) 4601 East Hilton Ave., Suite 100 Phoenix, Arizona 85034 Dear Mr. Fahlman: From June 27, 2017, to July 11, 2017, a U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) investigator inspected your facility, Park Infusioncare LP dba Preferred Homecare, located at 13621 Inwood Road, Suite 420, Dallas, Texas 75244-4645. The investigator noted serious deficiencies in your practices for producing sterile drug products, which put patients at risk. FDA issued a Form FDA 483 to your firm on July 11, 2017. FDA acknowledges receipt of your facility’s response, dated August 1, 2017. Based on this inspection, it appears that you produced drug products that violate the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (FDCA). A. Violations of the FDCA Adulterated Drug Products The FDA investigators noted that drug products intended or expected to be sterile were prepared, packed, or held under insanitary conditions, whereby they may have become contaminated with filth or rendered injurious to health, causing your drug products to be adulterated under section 501(a)(2)(A) of the FDCA. For example, 1.    Dead insects were observed in three separate locations of your pharmacy, including the area where aseptic production is performed. 2.    Residue was observed in three locations in your ISO 7 cleanroom, including the areas of both an ISO 5 hood and an (b)(4) where your technicians perform sterile production operations. 3.    Your firm used non-sterile wipes and a non-sterile disinfectant as part of your disinfection program for the aseptic processing area. 4.    Poor aseptic practices were observed at your firm. An aseptic operator was observed leaving the cleanroom to retrieve supplies from an anteroom and then returned to the aseptic production area to resume aseptic operations without changing or sanitizing gloves. In addition, an aseptic operator was observed donning sterile gloves improperly by touching the outside of the gloves with bare hands. 5.    Your media fill studies were not performed under the most challenging or stressful conditions of aseptic processing. Therefore, your products may be produced in an environment that poses a significant contamination risk. B. Corrective Actions We have reviewed your firm’s response to the Form FDA 483. Regarding the insanitary conditions observed during the inspection, some of your corrective actions appear to be adequate. However, we cannot fully evaluate the adequacy of the following corrective actions described in your response because you did not include adequate supporting documentation: 1.    Regarding the residue observation, you stated that ISO 5 Hood (b)(4) has been taken out of service and removed from the facility. In addition, you stated that you have cleaned, disinfected, and removed the residue from the contact surface grating of your (b)(4) . However, you did not provide supporting documentation (e.g., photos) to demonstrate that the residue has been effectively removed. 2.    Your firm committed to “replace all non-sterile disinfectants, pads, and wipes with sterile products.” However, you did not provide supporting documentation (e.g., purchase orders, certificates of analysis, product labels) to demonstrate that these non-sterile items have been replaced. 3.    You stated that you will revise your current procedures to incorporate “processes performed when using the (b)(4) for Total Parenteral Nutrition (TPN) manipulations.” However, supporting documentation, such as revised procedures and records of completed media fill simulations, was not provided for our review. Please be aware that section 501(a)(2)(A) of the FDCA concerning insanitary conditions applies regardless of whether drug products you compound meet the conditions of section 503A [21 U.S.C. § 353a]. FDA strongly recommends that your management undertake a comprehensive assessment of operations, including facility design, procedures, personnel, processes, maintenance, materials, and systems. In particular, this review should assess your aseptic processing operations. A third-party consultant with relevant sterile drug processing expertise should assist you in conducting this comprehensive evaluation. C. Conclusion The violations cited in this letter are not intended to be an all-inclusive statement of violations at your facility. You are responsible for investigating and determining the causes of the violations identified above and for preventing their recurrence or the occurrence of other violations. It is your responsibility to ensure that your firm complies with all requirements of federal law, including FDA regulations. You should take prompt action to correct the violations cited in this letter. Failure to promptly correct these violations may result in legal action without further notice, including, without limitation, seizure and injunction. Within fifteen (15) working days of receipt of this letter, please notify this office in writing of the specific steps that you have taken to correct the violations. Please include an explanation of each step being taken to prevent the recurrence of the violations, as well as copies of related documentation. If you do not believe that the products discussed above are in violation of the FDCA, include your reasoning and any supporting information for our consideration. If you cannot complete corrective action within fifteen (15) working days, state the reason for the delay and the time within which you will complete the correction. Your written notification should refer to the Warning Letter referencing CMS #547494. Please submit your written response to: John W. Diehl Director, Compliance Branch (DCB) U.S. Food and Drug Administration Office of Pharmaceutical Quality Operations (OPQO), Division II 4040 North Central Expressway, Suite 300 Dallas, Texas 75204 You may submit your written response via e-mail to Mr. John Diehl at John.Diehl@fda.hhs.gov . If you have questions regarding the contents of this letter, please contact John Diehl at 214-253-5288, or Thao Ta, Compliance Officer, at 214-253-5217. Sincerely, /S/ Monica R. Maxwell Program Division Director Office of Pharmaceutical Quality Operations, Division II cc: Ricque A. Gonder Branch Manager Park Infusioncare LP dba Preferred Homecare 13621 Inwood Road, Suite 420 Dallas, Texas 75244-4645 Mr. Michael Zuga Senior Vice President Preferred Homecare (Corporate Office) 4601 East Hilton Ave., Suite 100 Phoenix, Arizona 85034 Content current as of: 04/10/2018